Plumb Lines

July 17, 2009

The Most Violent American Movie?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Matthew Schmitz @ 1:17 am


Action and violence lie at the (bloody) heart of American cinema. Rambo, and Hannibal Lecter define its essence and, for that matter, its limits. An art form obsessed with exploding cars and pulsing muscles has little time for the depiction of the mundane exchanges that make up life.

It was precisely for breaking these constraints that Whit Stillman’s 1990 film Metropolitan was widely hailed. By depicting little other than the the conversations of its characters, it seemed to reject not only the usual visual orgy, but any idea of plot. The natural comparison seemed to be to the more plotless films of French New-Wave directors like Eric Rohmer and Jacques Rivette.

Metropolitan, though, is a consummately American film. Far from eschewing violence, it is obsessed with the damage that can be done by words, especially those spoken by those we love.  The few scenes of physical action that the film contains–one punch and one brief appearance of a pistol–look comically innocuous next to the much more vicious exchange of insults. Future attempts to understand violence on the screen should devote a little less attention to the likes of Mel Gibson and a little more to Stillman’s films.

Matthew Schmitz



  1. Matt,

    “Action and violence lie at the (bloody) heart of American cinema. Rambo, and Hannibal Lecter define its essence and, for that matter, its limits”? Perhaps a bit too broad. If forced, could you offer a specific period in American cinema that provides the best evidence for this statement? Was it / did it begin in the 1990s?

    Comment by P. Langdale Hough — July 17, 2009 @ 1:37 pm

  2. Certainly too broad a brush, but such is the stuff of blog provocation. I think it’s present from the beginning, though. Take Birth of a Nation, for example. A violent movie, that.

    Comment by Matthew Schmitz — July 17, 2009 @ 1:41 pm

  3. […] to stay in and rent a movie. I confess that my taste in films is neither as darkly interesting as Schmitz’s, or as artistic as Schaengold’s: I enjoy mindless blockbusters almost as much as any art […]

    Pingback by Watching “The Watchmen” « Plumb Lines — July 29, 2009 @ 6:55 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: